IPM Benefits

Economists and IPM researchers have worked for decades to develop methodology to assign a dollar value to the use of IPM technologies in agriculture. It has thus far been difficult to extract an exact dollar figure as to the cost savings of IPM implementation, although there has been general unanimous agreement that dollar savings are significant. Considering the cost of chemical pesticides and their application, even the reduction of one pesticide application can amount to a considerable reduction in pest control costs.

In addition to monetary considerations, the worth of IPM concepts to maintaining a healthy environment is undisputed. It is difficult, however, to place a value on preservation of the environment for current and future generations. It would be within reason to assume, though, that such contributions to maintaining the environment would be priceless.

Evaluation of IPM benefits has generally been obtained through pest management surveys, and analysis of pesticide use over time. In every such survey evaluation in Texas, IPM technologies have been shown to greatly reduce pesticide use and associated risks.

How has IPM benefited Texas crop producers?

IPM has helped producers increase net profits while reducing pesticide use and reducing production risks. The following are examples of results of evaluations conducted:

A 1994 survey of 637 crop producers in 25 counties showed the following:
* 58% decreased pesticide use by an average of 29%
* 46% increased yields
* 65% increased net profits
* $106 million increase in net profits statewide
* $340 million statewide economic impact annually

A 1996 evaluation of the pecan IPM program documented:
* insecticide use reduced 35%
* fungicide use reduced 30%
* increased pecan yields
* $6.06 million annual economic benefit to producers

Continued enhancements to IPM technologies coupled with new science have contributed to the on-going success of the Texas program. The use of IPM concepts has been endorsed and recognized by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as contributing to decreased agricultural production costs, a reduction in the use of pesticides, and a subsequent significant lowering of risks posed by pesticide use. Whether pesticides are used in agricultural settings, public schools, or private industry, the US EPA recommends the use sound, proven of IPM practices.