Educational
programs conducted by the Texas Agricultural Extension Service serve people
of all ages regardless of socioeconomic level, race, color, sex, religion,
disability or national origin. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
UNITED
STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE
OF
Attention: Charlie
Thomas, Director (Cthomas@agr.state.tx.us) The Environmental Protection Agency hereby grants a specific exemption under the provisions of Section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended, to the Texas Department of Agriculture for the use of flowable carbofuran on cotton to control aphids. This specific exemption is subject to the following conditions and restrictions: 1. The Texas Department of Agriculture is responsible for ensuring that all provisions of this specific exemption are met. It is also responsible for providing information in accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §166.32. Accordingly, a report summarizing the results of this program must be submitted to EPA Headquarters and the EPA Region 6 office by April 30, 2003 or prior to requesting another specific exemption for this use. 2. The product, Furadan 4F (a.i., carbofuran), EPA Reg. No. 279-2876, manufactured by FMC Corporation, may be applied. All applicable directions, restrictions, and precautions on the label submitted with your request must be followed. Applications may only be made by, or in direct supervision of, certified applicators. 3. No use of flowable carbofuran may take place until a county extension agent certifies in writing that a registered alternative product, either thiamethoxam ("Centric") or acetamiprid ("Assail") - once it has been registered - has been used for control of cotton aphid in cotton fields. To meet this condition, the Agency is requiring in general that 12% of Texas growers who have used carbofuran in the past now use either Centric or Assail prior to any Furadan applications. Given carbofuran use-by-region data, the Agency has determined that 12% of the growers has the following distribution: Coastal Bend: 60
growers County extension agents
must certify in writing that the designated number of growers per listed
region have used one of the alternatives prior to that region's use of
carbofuran. These written certifications shall be transmitted both to
the Texas Department of Agriculture, and to EPA's Office of Pesticide
Programs prior to any use of carbofuran. Additionally, at the end of the
season, EPA will receive in writing , documentation from the registrants
of these alternatives stating that their products have been used. 5. A maximum of 900,000 lbs. of carbofuran may be used under this specific exemption to treat up to 1,800,000 acres of cotton in Texas. 6. In order to protect Federally-listed threatened and endangered species from potentially harmful exposure to carbofuran, applicators must ascertain whether there are any listed species which could be adversely affected by their use of this product. If the applicator/landowner does not know whether there are any listed species that could be affected, they must contact the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department at (512) 389-4579 to determine whether currently occupied habitat for any listed species is located on or adjacent to the property to be treated with carbofuran. Application will be prohibited in treatment areas within one (1) mile of bald eagle nests; within 100 yards for ground applications and 1/4 mile for aerial applications for other terrestrial species; and within 20 yards for ground applications and 100 yards for aerial applications for aquatic species. 7. Do not apply directly to water, including immediately before or during irrigation. Do not apply where run-off is likely to occur to aquatic habitats. Do not make aerial applications within 200 yards, or ground applications within 20 yards of bodies of water, including rivers, streams, lakes, ponds, bogs, etc. 8. Carbofuran demonstrates the properties and characteristics associated with chemicals detected in ground water. Do not use in areas where groundwater is shallow and/or likely to become contaminated as a result of this use. The state of Texas will forward to EPA the results of any groundwater monitoring conducted in carbofuran use areas where this exemption is utilized. 9. In order to minimize risk of spray drift, the following measures must be adhered to: A. The distance of the outer-most nozzles on the boom must not exceed 3/4 of the length of the wingspan or rotor. B. Nozzles must always point backward parallel with the air stream and never be pointed downwards more than 45 degrees. C. Use high flow nozzles to apply the highest practical spray volume. Nozzles with higher rated flows produce larger droplets. D. Do not exceed the nozzle manufacturer's recommended pressures. For many nozzle types, lower pressure produces larger droplets. When higher flow rates are needed, use higher flow rate nozzles instead of increasing pressure. E. Use the minimum number of nozzles that provide uniform coverage. F. Orienting nozzles so that the spray is released parallel to the airstream produces larger droplets than other orientations, and is the recommended practice. Significant deflection from horizontal will reduce droplet size and increase drift potential. G. Use a nozzle type that is designed for the intended application. With most nozzle types, narrower spray angles produce larger droplets. Consider using low-drift nozzles. Solid stream nozzles oriented straight back produce the largest droplets and the least drift. H. For some use patterns, reducing the effective boom length to less than 3/4 of the wingspan or rotor length may further reduce drift without reducing swath width. I. Applications should not be made at a height greater than 10 feet above the top of the largest plants, unless a greater height is required for aircraft safety. Making applications at the lowest height that is safe reduces exposure of droplets to evaporation and wind. J. When applications are made with a cross wind, the swath will be displaced downwind. Therefore, on the up and downwind edges of the field, the applicator must compensate for this displacement by adjusting the path of the aircraft upwind. Swath adjustment distance should increase with increasing drift potential (higher wind, smaller drops, etc.). K. Drift potential is lowest with wind speeds between 2-10 mph. However, many factors, including droplet size and equipment type, determine drift potential at any given speed. Application should be avoided at wind speed below 2 mph due to variable wind direction and high inversion potential. Local terrain can influence wind patterns. Every applicator should be familiar with local wind patterns and how they affect spray drift. L. When making applications in low relative humidity, set up equipment to produce larger droplets to compensate for evaporation. Droplet evaporation is most severe when conditions are both hot and dry. M. Do not apply during a temperature inversion because drift potential is high. Temperature inversions restrict vertical air mixing, which causes small suspended droplets to remain in a concentrated cloud. This cloud can move in unpredictable directions, due to the light variable winds common during inversions. Temperature inversions are characterized by increasing temperatures with altitude, and are common on nights with limited cloud cover and light to no winds. N. Pesticides should only be applied when the potential for drift to adjacent sensitive areas (e.g., residential areas, bodies of water, know habitat for threatened or endangered species, non-target crops is minimal (e.g., when the wind is blowing away from the sensitive area). 10. A copy of the section 18 labeling must be in the user's possession at the time of application. 11. Residues of carbofuran resulting from applications made under this emergency exemption are not expected to exceed the established tolerances of 1.0 ppm (of which not more than 0.2 ppm is carbamates) in or on cottonseed; 0.05 ppm (of which not more than 0.02 ppm is carbamates) in or on fat, meat, and meat by-products of cattle, goats, hogs, horses and sheep; and 0.1 ppm (of which not more than 0.02 ppm is carbamates) in or on milk as a result of the proposed use. 12. Adequate analytical methods for enforcement purposes are available in PAM II. nalytical reference standards are available from the Pesticides and Industrial Chemicals Repository in RTP, NC. The Food and Drug Administration, DHHS, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, FSIS, have been notified of this action. 13. Use of closed mixing and loading systems for both aerial and ground application is required. 14. All areas where Furadan is applied under this specific exemption are required to be posted with signs developed and distributed in accordance with EPA's Worker Protection Standard (WPS). These signs picture a face with outstretched hand, and the words "Danger/Peligro, Pesticides/Pesticidas, KEEP OUT/NO ENTRE." For all use areas, signs must be visible from all usual points of entry to treated areas. For example, signs must be visible from each access road, each border with any labor camp next to the treated area, and each footpath and other walking route that enters the treated area. When there are no usual points of entry, signs must be posted in the corners of the treated area or in any other location affording maximum visibility. Signs must be visible and legible during the time they are posted. The signs shall be posted prior to treatment, so that they are present while application is being made. Signs shall remain in place for the entire re-entry interval as defined on the product's registered label (14 days post-application). 15. Handlers of carbofuran are required to wear coveralls over a long-sleeved shirt and long pants, shoes and socks for each job function, chemical resistant apron (when cleaning equipment, mixing, or loading), chemical resistant headgear for overhead exposure, protective eye wear, chemical resistant gloves, and respirator. 16 . The EPA Headquarters and EPA Regional Office shall immediately be informed of any adverse effects or misuse resulting from application of carbofuran in connection with this specific exemption. 17. A report summarizing the results of this program must be submitted, to EPA Headquarters and the EPA Regional Office, within 6 months following the expiration of this exemption or prior to requesting another specific exemption for this use. This final report shall include: A. Number of acres treated (identify number of acres treated once, as well as acres treated twice); B. Total amount of carbofuran used statewide under the emergency exemption; C. Data and samples of efficacy analyses which showed development of resistance and/or treatment failures in areas subsequently treated with Furadan; D. Documentation of application of a registered alternative product, either thiamethoxam or acetamiprid, prior to the use of carbofuran. Please identify the county extension agent who provided this documentation; E. Describe any human exposure incidents associated with this use (date, location, cause, etc.), and details of any enforcement actions taken by your agency; F. List of endangered species found in or adjacent to application areas, and number of individual organisms of each species which are observed. 18. This specific exemption expires on October 31, 2002. Any future correspondence related to this exemption should refer to file symbol 02-TX-06. As we have in the
past, the Agency will continue to work with your staff on an appropriate
approach to ensure cotton growers have adequate tools to control aphids.
- signed -
cc: U.S. EPA, Region
6 Director U.S. Food & Drug
Administration U.S. Food & Drug
Administration Commissioner |
|
3
|
|
Cotton
Aphid Efficacy Study - 2001 A small plot study was conducted at the Texas A&M Research and Extension Center's Hiler Farm in Weslaco, Texas, to evaluate the efficacy of selected insecticides against the cotton aphid on cotton. The primary emphasis of this study was to compare efficacy of various neonicotinoid insecticides. Plots were established in a field of Stoneville 474 cotton grown on 40 inch rows. Plot size: 3 rows by 25 feet. Experimental design: Randomized complete block with 4 replications. Treatments: Provado 1.6F at 3.75
fl oz/ac All insecticides + Silwet L-77 at 8 oz/100 gal. Application methodology: CO2 pressurized
backpack sprayer Application date: May 8, 2001. Sampling: Five plants were randomly selected from each plot on each sample date. All aphids on the first fully expanded leaf from the terminal were counted on each plant. Statistical analyses: PROC GLM of PC-SAS; DMRT; P<0.05. Results: Pest pressure was moderate to heavy at the time of application, with over 100 aphids per leaf in the check. Pest pressure was stable through 3 days after treatment (5/11), but decreased dramatically by 6 days after treatment (5/14). All insecticide treatments significantly reduced aphids on all three sample dates. In looking at the trends between May 9 and 11: Bidrin appears to have allowed some rebound of aphid densities; Leverage, Phaser and Furadan held densities steady; and the neonicotinoid insecticide treatments appeared to cause additional reductions between these two sample dates. None of the neonicotinoid insecticides showed a rate response with the rates tested. The combination treatment (Leverage) did show promise at suppression of aphid flaring normally associated with pyrethroid use. These data support earlier work with neonicotinoid insecticides against aphids which general shows relatively slow activity (to reach maximum reduction), but excellent efficacy, as compared to older chemistries. Table 38. Mean number of aphids per leaf on the first fully expanded leaf from the plant terminal, Weslaco, Texas, 2001.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4
|