![]() |
![]() |
|
PEST
MANAGEMENT NEWS
|
|||
| Jones | Mitchell |
Nolan
|
Scurry
|
| Stephen
Biles Extension Agent - IPM P.O. Box 558 Sweetwater, TX 79556 |
![]() |
Office:
(915) 236-9011
Fax: (915) 236-9018 e-mail: biles-sp@tamu.edu Website: http://nolan-ext.tamu.edu/ipm |
||||
|
|
||
| Vol. 5, No. 5 |
THE
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT NEWSLETTER
FOR THE LOWER ROLLING PLAINS |
June
17, 2002
|
|
|
||
|
GROWING
CONDITIONS
The cotton crop is mostly in the ground up to the 5 true-leaf stage. Soil moisture was greatly improved this past weekend by several thunderstorms. These storms dropped between 0.5 and 3+ inches of much needed rainfall. And most fields are not currently under any drought stress. COTTON INSECTS Thrips, where found, do not seem to be effecting the cotton crop and aphid numbers seem to be falling; field populations range from 0 to 15 per leaf. Right now, the biggest issue with the cotton crop is the grasshoppers. Grasshoppers have been observed infesting field margins of some cotton fields in numbers that should cause some concern. Several species have been identified including adults of the differential, redlegged and two-striped grasshopper and the nymphs of the wingless jumbo or lubber grasshopper. Most problem situations have been field margins adjacent to wheat, CRP, range land or weedy areas such as fence rows and ditches. Grasshoppers have also been a cotton problem in some terminated wheat fields. Treatment for grasshopper infested-cotton fields or areas of fields is justified when one lubber hopper is found on average per 3 row feet or two per square yard of vegetation around the field margin. For other species, we use twenty or more per square yard in crop margins or 10 or more per 3 row feet in the field as treatment guidelines. This is for smaller species of hoppers. Controlling grasshoppers early, especially when they are small is most effective. |
The
labeled synthetic pyrethroids are all probably very effective. A recent
test by extension IPM agents Scott Russell and Joe Kirk Newbrough indicated
that Karate Z, Asana and Capture were effective in reducing grasshopper
numbers but Lorsban was not. ULV malathion is also an option, especially
where rangeland is involved in the treatment. Dimilin is very effective
where most of the grasshoppers are not yet adults. Remember that adult
control is much more difficult than control of nymphs.
While many folks that are controlling grasshoppers at this time have opted for the relatively cheap and effective pyrethroids, there is a downside to their use. Pyrethroids can increase later aphid problems. Pyrethroids also effectively kill and prevent re-colonization of beneficial insects for a longer period than most other insecticides. And---there are resistance issues. Consider using a different class of insecticide. OP's like Bidrin work well. So does methyl parathion or Penncap-M. These are toxic materials and must be carefully used in accordance to the label.
|
|
Educational programs conducted by the Texas Agricultural Extension Service serve people of all ages regardless of socioeconomic level, race, color, sex, religion, handicap or national origin. The information given herein is for educational purposes only. References to commercial products or trade names is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Cooperative Extension Service is implied. We will seek to provice reasonable accomodations for all persons with disabilites for all extension programs. We request that you contact Mr. Stephen Biles (915/236-9011) as soon as possible to advise us of the auxiliary aid or service that your require. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 |
|
IPM
CONCEPTS
Questions to Ask Before Pest Management Decisions Are Made 1. What
pests are present, in what numbers and stages of development? Field
scouting and action thresholds can be used to provide much of the information
needed to answer these questions. Thorough field scouting provided by
an unbiased source who understands the crop and cropping system remains
a major tenant of IPM. |
Important
Terms and Concepts in IPM
Economic
Injury Level (EIL)- the lowest level of a pest that will cause economic
damage, ie. the level of pests where the dollar loss caused by the pest
exceed the cost of control The economic threshold is a key IPM decision-making tool. Thresholds are based on considerable amounts of research and/or field experience. If the economic threshold is approached, but not reached, do not apply a pesticide at that time. Instead, re-scout the field within a few days to determine the status of the infestation. Pest populations can decline naturally due to mortality from natural enemies and unfavorable weather conditions. Also, many pests, such as caterpillars, change from an active feeding (larva) to a non-feeding stage (pupa) during their development. Such changes will often produce a natural decline in infestations as pupation occurs.
|
| This program is possible due to the contributions of the businesses, organizations, and boards listed below. Please show your appreciation for their commitment to your IPM Program. | |
| Jones
Co. Corinth Gin Tuxedo Farmers Gin Co. Farmers COOP Gin - Hamlin Farmers COOP Gin - Anson Farmers COOP Gin - Stamford Mitchell
Co. |
Nolan
Co. Roscoe COOP Gin Helena Chemical U. A. P. Pieper Crop Insurance Roscoe State Bank Scurry
Co. Posted at this web site by: texagnet Internet Services.
|
|
2
|