![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||
| Richard
Minzenmayer Extension Agent-IPM E-mail: r-minzenmayer@tamu.edu Website: http://entowww.tamu.edu Phone (915) 365-5212 Fax (915) 365-5337 |
June
29, 2001
Vol XIV No. 11 P.O. Box 658 Ballinger, Tx 76821 Mobile: (915) 365-1292 |
||
Heavy Insect pressure continues in area cotton and to a lesser extent in grain sorghum. Grasshoppers and cotton fleahoppers remain the insect pests of concern. False chinch bugs can be found in some sorghum field. The Concho Valley continues to wait patiently on much needed rainfall. Cotton is holding up well under these hot dry conditions but the weather is taking its toll on sorghum fields. Scouts are
on a regular schedule now and reports are being left at Area |
Irrigated cotton looks great and is progressing right on schedule. Most fields have required an insecticide application for fleahoppers and in some situations thrips as well. Cotton ranges in growth from the cotyledon stage to 1/3 grown square stage. There is a wide variation in growth stages this year and this will have an impact on insect scouting and management decisions as the season progresses. Early spring rains, lots of early weed hosts, coupled with hot dry conditions throughout June have caused heavy fleahopper infestations in cotton. Cotton is the only host plant green and fleahoppers are taking advantage of it. Expect problems to continue for the next several weeks. |
|
1
|
|
Fleahopper numbers
ranged from 9 to 68 fleahoppers per 100 terminals this Some dryland cotton fields have reached matchhead square and fleahopper numbers are high and square rates are well below 70%. A two-inch rain would certainly help make a decision on whether to load the cotton plant or wait. If you have sufficient irrigation water to set and maintain a good fruit load, then it's important to save these early squares. If you don't have sufficient moisture, then it's questionable on protecting the early fruit that will shed later due to moisture stresses or other environmental. Pray for Rain. Insecticides labeled for fleahopper control include Orthene, Address, Bidrin Dimethoate, Provado, Stewart, Lorsban, and several others. Check TAEX publication E-6A for recommended rates or give me a call.
There is a Conservation
Tillage Tour scheduled and sponsored by the |
They
will also have an Equipment demonstration. Listed below is the schedule
for the Tour.
1. Begin the tour at 8:30 a.m. at the Richard Pelzel Farm (South of Hwy. 67 between Miles and Rowena). Depart for Fred Wilde Farm (Bethel) at 9:00 a.m. 2. Arrive at Fred
Wilde farm by 9:30 a.m. 3. Arrive at Halfmann
farm by 10:30 a.m. 4. Arrive at Minzenmayer
farm at Equipment Demonstration: A map is attached for your convenience.
By Dr. Carl G.
Anderson The increased interest by more countries where cotton and textiles are produced in globalization and "freer trade" stems mainly from the economics of competition. |
|||
|
2 |
|
As a result, the U.S. cotton industry is being challenged by imported textiles and substantial foreign cotton and chemical fiber production. Consequently,
U.S. cotton producers, the marketing system, and textile manufacturers
are facing a major restructuring development to a much A greater dependence on sales overseas to maintain a sizable acreage means more cotton price instability. Exports tend to increase when foreign stocks are low and prices move higher. Likewise, when prices decrease, U.S. exports also decline and larger carryovers result, driving the price even lower. With the U.S. mostly a residual supplier, its percent of world exports tend to follow movements in the "A" Index. The industry challenge is to balance supply and demand at a reasonable price. Acreage Set-Aside
Shows Little Impact on Exports |
For
example, the export share has declined slightly since the 1996 farm legislation
which removed supply management provisions.
The price decrease, since 1996, that followed from more cotton production and increased supply relative to demand, has not been successful in offsetting the non-price competition from foreign countries. Further evidence shows that limitations on acreage and increases in market shares occurred at the same time during the 1991 to 1995 seasons. Despite sharply lower prices since 1997, and no acreage reduction program (ARP), mill use has declined from 11.35 to about 8.6 million bales in recent months. But, even more significant, exports decreased from 9.4 million bales in the 1994 season to 4.3 in 1998. International Non-Price Forces Partly Offset Influence of Decreased Prices Thus, political and non-price forces in the international cotton market appear to be overpowering the influence of price movements. A strong U.S. dollar is only one of the factors partly offsetting decreased cotton prices. Foreign government influence on production, textile manufacturing and export and import policies are major factors too. Clearly, export markets are far more unstable than the domestic market year-in, year-out. The "roller
coaster" price movements now occurring are the expected |
|
|
3 |
|
Also, the "pick" program in 1983 was designed to cut planted acreage to 7.9 million, down from 14.5 million three years earlier. The drop in U.S. cotton prices from the high 60's to the low 40's since January signals the shift to a more volatile export-directed market. Too, the severe price drop is counter to the usual seasonal price rise around planting time. The sudden 25-cent
per pound decline indicates how fragile the export
|
AT A BIRTHDAY PARTY, it came time to serve the cake. A little boy name Brian blurted out, "I want the biggest piece!" His mother quickly scolded him. "Brian, it's not polite to ask for the biggest piece." The little guy looked at her in confusion, and asked, "Well then, how do you get it?"
Olive Freedman
We
will have two on Tuesday and two on Tuesday,
July 3rd Wednesday,
July 4th
|
|||
|
Educational programs conducted by the Texas Agricultural Extension Service serve people of all ages regardless of socioeconomic level, race, color, sex, religion, handicap or national origin. The information given herein is for educational purposes only. References to commercial products or trade names is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Cooperative Extension Service is implied. The Texas A&M University
System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Commissioners Courts
of Texas Cooperating
|
|
4
|